Wednesday, 4 May 2016

Federal budget 2016: arts experts react

Joanna Mendelssohn, UNSW Australia; Jason Potts, RMIT University; Julian Meyrick, Flinders University, and Peter Tregear, Royal Holloway

Last night’s federal budget had little to say about the arts. The Arts Party described it as a “nothing” budget for the arts, while Live Performance Australia said it “fails to deliver any major new policy initiatives or programs” for the industry. The Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance, meanwhile, highlighted the fact that while the ABC’s base funding has been maintained, funding for specialist news services will be cut by A$18.6 million over the next three years.

So, what does all this mean for Australian arts and culture? Our academic experts offer their insights.

What happened Malcolm?

Joanna Mendelssohn, associate professor of art and design, University of NSW

We had such hopes for Malcolm: a Prime Minister who revelled in an excellent art collection, a cultured and witty man, who understood that the country needs to be intellectually nimble as it creatively innovates with the latest IT and scientific discoveries on the information superhighway.

Furthermore, here was someone who could address Q&A in his snappy leather jacket. As a graduate of Sydney Grammar and then the University of Sydney, he surely knew that an excellent education is a pathway to success, and to the country’s future prosperity.

Well this budget shows how wrong we were. Scott Morrison’s stern warning to those who keep the wheels of government turning is that the government is “continuing to keep government spending under control”. So nothing for the National Library, National Gallery, National Museum, Australian War Memorial or the Australia Council – which is already on life support.

The only infrastructure mentioned in his government speech is “roads, rail, dams, and public transport” – it gives a mental image of men in hard hats and high viz vests standing in front of earnest television interviewers for the tabloid news. The only difference between the Turnbull and the Abbott era is the addition of trains and public transport.

National arts institutions, along with the rest of the Australian Public Service, will suffer from an expansion of the so-called “efficiency dividend” from which “net savings of $1.4 billion will be achieved over three years”.

Probably the best thing arts organisations can do is to line up to give internships for “young jobless” as for the first time in living memory young job seekers are not being harassed but subsidised for their first chance of work. So while there are no regular jobs, it might be possible for embattled arts organisations to give a break to a school leaver.

And that is it for the arts – not very much at all.

What rhymes with ‘submarine’?

Jason Potts, professor of economics, RMIT University

The main thing that happened with the arts in the 2016 budget is that nothing happened with the arts in the 2016 budget. The arts and culture are obviously not to be part of this coming election campaign.

“This is not a time to be splashing money around” said ScoMo, and then didn’t, except on dams and trains and submarines. So much money splashed on so many submarines.

On the face of it, that’s good. It means that the new and existing models (e.g. Catalyst, carved out from the Australia Council) are being bedded down. Whatever you think of the new model, which has moved A$15 or so million into a centrally allocated program, this is now the model. So there is value in being ignored, in being made neither a priority, nor a target.

The main benefit, as I see it, came from the corporate tax cuts, small, but a good start. A healthy arts economy ultimately comes from private spending, corporate sponsorship and philanthropy, not from government handouts.

Anyway, someone’s got to paint all those submarines. Write songs about them. Make the movies and stories and evocative dances that show us as a great, nay proud and unrivalled, submarining nation.

A black and unhappy farce

Julian Meyrick, professor of creative arts, Flinders University

Beckett plays are full of nothing. Narratively, not much goes on. Spiritually, audiences lurch into free fall at the absurdity of human existence. There’s time to consider what you should be doing with your life.

A bit like this year’s federal arts budget, with Scott Morrison playing the part of Winnie, buried up to her neck in sand, or Nag, who has to spend his time in a box.

No doubt the sector will breath a sigh of relief no major cuts have been unveiled. There’s still the thumbscrew of the efficiency dividend (“4.9% in real terms from 2015-16 to 2016-17, and 9.5% in real terms over the period 2016-17 to 2019-20”) and a resulting stream of job losses undermining arts organisations large and small.

But at least the Australia Council has survived with its change purse un-raided and its arm’s length relationship intact. With decisions about four-year funding only days away, that will mean better sleep for arts practitioners across the country.

Still, let’s be honest, what was there to cut? One more slice from the “arts and cultural heritage sub-function” and there wouldn’t be much sub-function left to slice. As it is, the lack of investment in the sector is the culmination of two and half years of mistreatment, misunderstanding, and neglect.

No mention of the arts in the Overview at all (unless you include “support [for] a culture of ideas and innovation to encourage commercialisation, reward enterprise and facilitate investment").

Modern economics is a bit like modern drama. The jokes are black and the endings rarely happy. It works on a slenderising principle of “more for less” that can sometimes transmogrify into “everything for nothing”.

That’s certainly the kind of economic thinking the federal government favours. Rating: one and a half stars.

How much do we value ourselves?

Peter Tregear, teaching fellow, Royal Holloway

As expected, this year’s federal budget delivered no respite from - but also no dramatic furtherance of - the cuts to arts funding bodies and cultural institutions of recent years.

The devil, however, is not in this detail but in the failure, once again, to offer a compelling overall policy framework and vision for the arts in Australia. It is no surprise, therefore, to find no significant new arts programs or reforms in this year’s budget either.

While the Australia Council has, for instance, only had to cop an additional A$2 million cut (or around 1%) in its total outlay, overall this budget only confirms its fate to be no longer an arms-length policy and advocacy body for artists but rather a funding delivery mechanism for Government initiatives.

With no relief from their obligations to deliver multi-year “efficiency dividends”, our national cultural institutions, similarly, must now operate within severally limited imaginative horizons.

And yet, as Julianne Schultz argued recently in The Conversation, the fact that so much of Australian public life is now in the sway of forces beyond our immediate control only makes the civic role of these institutions “more important than ever”, lest our own imaginative horizons become circumscribed by images, shapes, and sounds chosen for us by global media companies with a product to sell, not a civil society to nourish.

Sure, the budget also outlines a growing expectation from the government that these organisations can raise more and more funds from corporate and private philanthropy.

But will those companies and individuals among us who have particularly benefited from this age of unprecedented creation, and concentration, of wealth be prepared to assist?

If government is increasingly unable to express much enthusiasm for the role of the arts in Australian life, why should they? Well, to quote Schultz again,
it is the cultural richness, the democratic, inclusive, pragmatic, egalitarian, highly skilled, educated and creative elements of Australia that make us attractive and distinctive.
Or, to put it another way, how much do we value ourselves?

The Conversation
Joanna Mendelssohn, Associate Professor, Art & Design: UNSW Australia. Editor in Chief, Design and Art of Australia Online, UNSW Australia; Jason Potts, Professor of Economics, RMIT University; Julian Meyrick, Professor of Creative Arts, Flinders University, and Peter Tregear, Teaching Fellow, Royal Holloway

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.


head soccer said...

Hello, I am Lindaz Sophia. I like playing head soccer unblocked, I used to play these webs about big head soccer. Today, I introduce many web about sports head basketball as follows:
- Sports head soccer is a web game which has many exciting games.
- Besides, you can access a web big head basketball so that you play these games.
Have fun!

kalyan ram said...

Hello there,
You are doing just amazing work. I think it's time to change the layout of the blog.
Song Video Download
Video Download
Punjabi Song Video Download
Funny Video Download
Sports Video Download
Download TV Show Episode Videos
Dance Video Download

Falahhunn said...

best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE
best university in UAE

xender for PC said...

shareit for pc
shareit download
shareit for windows
shareit for pc
download shareit for windows7/8/8.1/10
shareit on pc download
shareit app
love quotes
imo for pc

pongal said...

Sankranti Wishes

Sankranti Wishes 2017

2017 Sankranti Wishes

happy sankranti wishes 2017

happy sankranti wishes

sankranti 2017 Wishes

bettycyoung said...

good and also tutuapp for ios is a wonderful method for accessing tutu app download approaches to hack or cheat in Pokemon Go however not much nice.

cathrynzbrown said...

good also uninstall the TuTu Application. Soon after effective tutuapp pokemon software program maintains upgrading their variation in nice.

Vaishali gore said...

Hi ! This is my first visit to your blog! Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on
ipl point table 2017
watch IPL 2017 live stream onlibe @ crictime & hotstrar

mcx free tips said...

The Federal Budget is morbidly obese and gaining weight every day. The Federal Government's inability to eliminate the deficit means that the national debt continues to increase daily. The only way the deficit can be reduced is by a combination of spending reductions and increased revenues.

Cool Boy said...

Zapya for pc
Zapya download pc
Zapya for windows
Zapya apk download
Zapya for Windows
mobdro for Windows
mobdro pc download
Shareit pc Download
Shareit download
Shareit download
xender download app
xender app download
xender download for pc
Shareit apk Download
tubemate apk Download